Beneficial Animal Testing Essay -- Science Ethics Scientific Research

dear Animal Testing Animal test has always been plagued with controversy on its ethical issues by animate being activist groups and supportive scientists. Is it mor all toldy erect to experiment and sacrifice laboratory faunas on behalf of human research? Dr. Gina Solomon MD wrote her article regarding the benefits of fleshly testing to protect the human race and all other species. Her article The Lesser Evil shows the beneficial and positive aspects of animal experimentation. She approves the notion for animal testing but requests greater regulation and gentler methods of testing when scientifically possible. Dr. Solomons article was published in the Earth Island Journal, drop 2002, v17, i3, pg 47. Dr. Gina Solomon MD kit and caboodle for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). She is a senior scientist and mendelevium of the Health and Environment program. Dr. Solomons article is trustworthy and credible because she is a licensed practitioner of medicine and a chief scientist. She relies on face-to-face experience and scientific data to justify the use of animal testing. She works for a reputable nonprofit organization whose opinions are valued for the egis of human liveness. Dr. Solomon focuses her article toward those who are undecided or opposed to animal testing. She hopes to persuade her audience of the scientific human advantage gained by animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is essential for the protection from harmful chemicals and pesticides for all subsisting creatures on Earth. The animal research allows scientist to better recognize and distinguish deplorable materials for humans and wildlife. Animal activist agencies, such as PETA (People for the Ethical give-and-take of Animals), ar... ...a huge uncontrolled chemical experiment, (Solomon, pg 47). I enjoyed Dr. Solomons article because she justifies her parentage very thoroughly. She uses person-to-person experience and fac tual information to support her opinions on animal testing. I found her article to be informative as well as persuasive. Her trustworthy personality shines through her article from her personal beliefs and convictions. She acknowledges the need for animal experimentation but does not appreciate the gaga of any animal life. She used scientific research to explain the need to discover the dangerous chemical side effects endangering all life forms. The byproducts of Dr. Solomons article will be a better apprehension for animal testing. People will accept testing on animals to be an essential part of human and wildlife protection from toxic chemicals and pesticides.